ASRock Beebox-S 7200U Kaby Lake UCFF PC Reviewby Ganesh T S on February 7, 2017 8:00 AM EST
Performance Metrics - I
The ASRock Beebox-S 7200U was evaluated using our standard test suite for low power desktops / industrial PCs. Not all benchmarks were processed on all the machines due to updates in our testing procedures. Therefore, the list of PCs in each graph might not be the same. In the first section, we will be looking at SYSmark 2014 SE, as well as some of the Futuremark benchmarks.
BAPCo SYSmark 2014 SE
BAPCo's SYSmark 2014 SE is an application-based benchmark that uses real-world applications to replay usage patterns of business users in the areas of office productivity, media creation and data/financial analysis. In addition, it also addresses the responsiveness aspect which deals with user experience as related to application and file launches, multi-tasking etc. Scores are meant to be compared against a reference desktop (the SYSmark 2014 SE calibration system in the graphs below). While the SYSmark 2014 benchmark used a Haswell-based desktop configuration, the SYSmark 2014 SE makes the move to a Lenovo ThinkCenter M800 (Intel Core i3-6100, 4GB RAM and a 256GB SATA SSD). The calibration system scores 1000 in each of the scenarios. A score of, say, 2000, would imply that the system under test is twice as fast as the reference system.
The scores tend to align with the capabilities of the CPU in the systems. The Core i5-7200U in the Beebox-S slightly lags the Core i7-7500U in the Cubi 2 in terms of both cache size and clock frequency. Obviously, neither of them can match the capabilities of the desktop-class CPU with higher TDP in the calibration system. The only scenario where the Beebox-S scores is responsiveness - likely due to the use of a NVMe SSD compared to the SATA SSD used in the Cubi 2.
SYSmark 2014 SE also adds energy measurement to the mix. A high score in the SYSmark benchmarks might be nice to have, but, potential customers also need to determine the balance between power consumption and the efficiency of the system. For example, in the average office scenario, it might not be worth purchasing a noisy and power-hungry PC just because it ends up with a 2000 score in the SYSmark 2014 SE benchmarks. In order to provide a balanced perspective, SYSmark 2014 SE also allows vendors and decision makers to track the energy consumption during each workload. In the graphs below, we find the total energy consumed by the PC under test for a single iteration of each SYSmark 2014 SE workload and how it compares against the calibration systems.
The comparative energy consumption numbers for each scenario are as expected. The Beebox-S is slightly more energy-intensive (despite the use of a CPU with the same TDP as the Cubi 2) likely due to the more power-hungry NVMe SSD in the assembled configuration.
Futuremark PCMark 8
PCMark 8 provides various usage scenarios (home, creative and work) and offers ways to benchmark both baseline (CPU-only) as well as OpenCL accelerated (CPU + GPU) performance. We benchmarked select PCs for the OpenCL accelerated performance in all three usage scenarios. These scores are heavily influenced by the CPU in the system. The storage system also plays a significant role - which is why we see the Beebox-S 7200U and the MSI Cubi 2 trade positions in the top two spots depending on the benchmark. Interestingly, for these workloads, the 15W TDP Core i5-7200U is enough to go past the Skylake and Broadwell BRIX units that configure the CPU for a 28W TDP.
Miscellaneous Futuremark Benchmarks
The GPU-focused benchmarks perform similarly for both the Beebox-S 7200U and the Cubi 2. However, the Skylake Intel NUC with Iris Graphics manages to comfortably outscore the Intel HD Graphics 620 in the Beebox-S 7200U.
3D Rendering - CINEBENCH R15
We have moved on from R11.5 to R15 for 3D rendering evaluation. CINEBENCH R15 provides three benchmark modes - OpenGL, single threaded and multi-threaded. Evaluation of select PCs in all three modes provided us the following results. The OpenGL version numbers stack up similar to the Futuremark GPU benchmarks. The CPU versions are in line with expectations for a Core i5 U-series CPU.
Post Your CommentPlease log in or sign up to comment.
View All Comments
fanofanand - Thursday, February 9, 2017 - linkThis is probably why they are tapping AMD for iGPU's, or at least those are the rumors.
surfnaround - Tuesday, February 21, 2017 - linkThe GTX630 (or 730, or whatever nvidia deems should fill its place) is your friend...
25watt max, faster than OBG... and only tends to add 3watts at idle...
Sene - Wednesday, February 8, 2017 - linkthanks but I want to use only for 1080p, no 4K files. Would that be OK with basic settings ?
HideOut - Tuesday, February 7, 2017 - linkWhen they gonna learn to use 2x2 AC wireless...
Samus - Wednesday, February 8, 2017 - linkI know...but money. It's an easy corner to cut, annoyingly. I can't tell you how many OEM systems I upgrade monthly from crap non-AC or crap 1x1 mPCIe adapters. And it's not the simplest part to upgrade, either, when you are dealing with Dell, HP and Lenovo's obsession with whitelisting specific parts.
fanofanand - Wednesday, February 8, 2017 - linkYou are undoubtedly right but it's still a big impact on the user experience waiting for videos to buffer. Seems like another stupid beancounter idea.
lordmocha - Wednesday, February 8, 2017 - link"After some back and forth with ASRock, and getting hold of an updated LSPCon firmware and BIOS (v1.60), we were able to get Netflix 4K streams to work."
Any word on the availability of the updated LSPcon firmware? Is it available for download, are new units being shipped with it yet?...
ganeshts - Thursday, February 9, 2017 - linkLatest LSPCon firmware with HDCP 2.2 support is already available for download in the Utilities section here:
I will check with them on the BIOS...
Ranger1065 - Friday, February 10, 2017 - linkIt's abundantly clear that Anandtech no longer gives a damn about what its readers are interested in.
BrokenCrayons - Friday, February 10, 2017 - linkAT's articles are broadly representative of what the computer industry is doing. Presuming you're interest is in DIY desktop computers, there are exactly two GPU companies and two CPU companies that release new products at predictable intervals with predictable increases in performance. Honestly, there's not much to talk about that would keep those sorts of people happy between release cycles. It'd therefore be more accurate to say that the computer industry no longer cares what Ranger1065 is interested in.