Performance Metrics - II

In this section, we mainly look at benchmark modes in programs used on a day-to-day basis, i.e, application performance and not synthetic workloads.

x264 Benchmark

First off, we have some video encoding benchmarks courtesy of x264 HD Benchmark v5.0. This is simply a test of CPU performance. As expected, the higher-clocked / higher-TDP Core i7-4770R-based systems perform better than the Core i7-4712MQ in the VisionX 471D. However, the significant upgrade over the Core i5-4200M in the VisionX 420D must be noted.

Video Encoding - x264 5.0 - Pass 1

Video Encoding - x264 5.0 - Pass 2

7-Zip

7-Zip is a very effective and efficient compression program, often beating out OpenCL accelerated commercial programs in benchmarks even while using just the CPU power. 7-Zip has a benchmarking program that provides tons of details regarding the underlying CPU's efficiency. In this subsection, we are interested in the compression and decompression MIPS ratings when utilizing all the available threads.

7-Zip LZMA Compression Benchmark

7-Zip LZMA Decompression Benchmark

TrueCrypt

As businesses (and even home consumers) become more security conscious, the importance of encryption can't be overstated. CPUs supporting the AES-NI instruction for accelerating the encryption and decryption processes have, till now, been the higher end SKUs. However, with Bay Trail, even the lowly Atom series has gained support for AES-NI. The Core i7-4712MQ in the VisionX 471D does have AES-NI support. TrueCrypt, a popular open-source disk encryption program can take advantage of the AES-NI capabilities. The TrueCrypt internal benchmark provides some interesting cryptography-related numbers to ponder. In the graph below, we can get an idea of how fast a TrueCrypt volume would behave in the ASRock VisionX 471D and how it would compare with other select PCs. This is a purely CPU feature / clock speed based test.

TrueCrypt Benchmark

Agisoft Photoscan

Agisoft PhotoScan is a commercial program that converts 2D images into 3D point maps, meshes and textures. The program designers sent us a command line version in order to evaluate the efficiency of various systems that go under our review scanner. The command line version has two benchmark modes, one using the CPU and the other using both the CPU and GPU (via OpenCL). The benchmark takes around 50 photographs and does four stages of computation:

  • Stage 1: Align Photographs
  • Stage 2: Build Point Cloud (capable of OpenCL acceleration)
  • Stage 3: Build Mesh
  • Stage 4: Build Textures

We record the time taken for each stage. Since various elements of the software are single threaded, others multithreaded, and some use GPUs, it is interesting to record the effects of CPU generations, speeds, number of cores, DRAM parameters and the GPU using this software. One can reap significant benefits from the AMD R9 270MX in the OpenCL-accelerated second stage, as shown in the graphs below.

Agisoft PhotoScan Benchmark - Stage 1

Agisoft PhotoScan Benchmark - Stage 2

Agisoft PhotoScan Benchmark - Stage 3

Agisoft PhotoScan Benchmark - Stage 4

Dolphin Emulator

Wrapping up our application benchmark numbers is the Dolphin Emulator benchmark mode results. This is again a test of the CPU capabilities. Larger the number of available threads, the better is the performance. Within that set, systems based on CPUs with faster clocks / higher TDP compared to the Core i7-4712MQ perform better.

Dolphin Emulator Benchmark

Performance Metrics - I Gaming Benchmarks
Comments Locked

30 Comments

View All Comments

  • weez82 - Monday, January 26, 2015 - link

    How are we suppose to watch a bluray using this machine as an HTPC? For that price and the fact it's marketing towards the HTPC market, they dropped the ball on that one
  • Mvoigt - Tuesday, January 27, 2015 - link

    Bluray drive on the usb maybe.... just an suggestion like this http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Sub...
  • FelixDraconis - Monday, January 26, 2015 - link

    This looks pretty awesome for when it is discounted to $399!
  • milkod2001 - Tuesday, January 27, 2015 - link

    This current build is a joke, looking at price and temperatures it reaches. 90c in such small form factor and small fan must make this machine incredibly noisy and annoying after short period of use.

    This thing just screams for Broadwell and $500 price tag including OS.
  • juhatus - Friday, January 30, 2015 - link

    Maybe put an AMD CPU APU in it and it will be ~400ish..
  • boe - Tuesday, February 3, 2015 - link

    Agreed - a fanless case design is what I'll want if I build a HTPC.
  • jabber - Wednesday, January 28, 2015 - link

    I think they have lost the plot with these. I bought a lot of the original Atom ION version of this box and at the time it really was something. Perfect for office use and also not too bad as a home PC for general duties. Pretty cheap and well featured. Also all of them are still working perfectly, some have even had SSD upgrades. This just seems way over the top in comparison.
  • aj654987 - Wednesday, January 28, 2015 - link

    I would rather get rid of the mobile gpu, reduce the cost and swap out the dvd drive for a blue ray. $1000 for a SFF pc aimed at HTPC with a dvd and not blueray doesnt make sense. Seems like they arent sure who they are targeting with this configuration.
  • meacupla - Friday, January 30, 2015 - link

    If only it packed in a GTX970M or GTX980M...

    M270X? really?
  • boe - Tuesday, February 3, 2015 - link

    I would be very interested in one for a HTPC provided it supported 4K@60, needed NO fans (fine if they make it bigger and wider with radiator fins in the back and sides. I really don't need a disc player.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now