Over the past several years AnandTech has grown to be much more than just a PC hardware review site. In fact, we consider ourselves to be just as much about the new mobile world as we do about the old PC world. We leveraged our understanding of component and system architecture in bringing a deeper, more analytical look to mobile silicon and devices. As we continued to invest in our mobile coverage and expertise, we found that readers, mobile component and device makers responded quite well to our approach.

AnandTech’s focus grew, but we quickly ran into a bottleneck when it came time to monetize that mobile content. Our mobile content did a great job of helping to grow the site (as well as bring new eyeballs to our traditional PC coverage as well). While we had no issues competing with larger corporate owned sites on the content front, when it came to advertising we were at a disadvantage. Our advantage in quality allowed us to make progress, but ultimately it became a numbers game. The larger corporate owned sites could show up with a network of traffic, substantially larger than what AnandTech could deliver, and land more lucrative advertising deals than we were able to. They could then in turn fund a larger editorial operation and the cycle continues.

AnandTech has been profitable since its inception; it’s been on a great growth curve these past couple of years and we’ve always been able to do more with less, but lately there’s been an increased investment in high quality content. It wasn’t that long ago where the only type of content seeing real investment was shallow, poorly researched and ultimately very cable-TV-news-like. More recently however we’ve seen a shift. Higher quality content is being valued and some big names (both on the publishing and VC fronts) have been investing in them. Honestly we haven’t seen a world like this in probably over a decade.

Before his departure, Anand spent almost a year meeting with all of the big names in the publishing space, both traditional and new media players. The goal was to find AnandTech a home with a partner that had a sustainable business model (similar to AnandTech’s), but could add the investment and existing reach to allow the site to better realize its potential. That search led to a number of interesting potential partners; it was a refreshing experience to say the least knowing that there are groups in the world who really value good content. Ultimately that search brought AnandTech to Purch.

Purch met the requirements: they have a sustainable business model, are profitable and have the sort of reach AnandTech needs to really hit the next level. More fundamentally however, Purch’s values are in line with AnandTech’s. In fact, it wasn’t that long ago that Purch acquired one of AnandTech’s biggest competitors in the late 1990s: Tom’s Hardware. Purch had already demonstrated a value for the sort of deep, long form content AnandTech was known for. In meeting with the Purch business and editorial teams, there was a clear interest in further developing AnandTech’s strengths as well as feeding back AnandTech’s learnings into the rest of the Purch family.

AnandTech and Tom’s Hardware remain editorially independent, and though no longer competitors, the goal is to learn from one another. To further invest in the areas that make us different, and together with the rest of the Purch family help to bring a higher standard of quality to the web.

The AnandTech team is staying in place and will continue to focus on existing coverage areas. We’re not changing our editorial policies or analytical approach and have no intentions of doing so. The one thing that will change is our ability to continue to grow the site. This if anything starts from the top; with a publisher to more directly handle the business of AnandTech, this frees me up to spend more time on content creation and helping the rest of our editors put together better articles. And in a hands-on business like journalism that benefit cannot be overstated.

AnandTech was an incredibly powerful force as an independent publisher, but it now joins a family whose combined traffic is eight times larger than what AnandTech was on its own. Our goal is to continue to invest in what we feel is the right approach to building high quality content; now we have an even greater ability to do just that.

Press Release
Comments Locked

345 Comments

View All Comments

  • Rand - Wednesday, December 17, 2014 - link

    Given how rapidly and starkly Tom's Hardware declined after Purch purchased them, you can hardly blame people for being somewhat pessimistic and a tad dubious that AnandTech will remain what it once was.
    I doubt even the most optimistic of people is likely to argue that Ton's Hardware is even a tenth the site it was at it's peak.

    Purch has developed an awfully negative reputation, and while you understandably have to present this in a positive light you must also be aware of that reputation and why they have it.
    As the content posted is now under the purview of Purch it's only logical to expect Purch to handle things similarly to how they have in the past.
    And I don't think how they've handled things in the past is a manner anyone thinks highly of.
  • rickon66 - Wednesday, December 17, 2014 - link

    I been around pretty much since AnandTech started, first he leaves and now this. It was fun while it lasted - RIP Anandtech.
  • MatthiasP - Wednesday, December 17, 2014 - link

    If this was the reason the DailyTech side bar is gone then it's one step in the right direction.
  • Gasaraki88 - Wednesday, December 17, 2014 - link

    Too bad Tom's Hardware turned to shit after they got bought. Now the same thing's happening.... ='(
  • juicytuna - Wednesday, December 17, 2014 - link

    Does anyone know how much it was sold for? Is that public knowledge?
  • hughlle - Wednesday, December 17, 2014 - link

    Best of luck. However these guys also bought toms hardware, so i have a hard time beleiving they are good investors.

    Best have a plan up your sleeve for replacing dailytech though. I imagine you've just gone and lost a substantial number of regular visitors as a result. While reviews were detailed, they were far and few between, many of us came here mostly for dailytech, with the idea of reading a review as a secondary purpose. No reason for myself to visit this place on even a semi-frequent basis now.
  • hughlle - Wednesday, December 17, 2014 - link

    Best of luck. However these guys also bought toms hardware, so i have a hard time beleiving they are good investors.

    Best have a plan up your sleeve for replacing dailytech though. I imagine you've just gone and lost a substantial number of regular visitors as a result. While reviews were detailed, they were far and few between, many of us came here mostly for dailytech, with the idea of reading a review as a secondary purpose. No reason for myself to visit this place on even a semi-frequent basis now.
  • prime2515103 - Wednesday, December 17, 2014 - link

    Is this why the Daily Tech feed is missing?
  • Malih - Wednesday, December 17, 2014 - link

    "That search led to a number of interesting potential partners"

    And you chose Purch? That's what make me sad and pessimistic about the future of this site.

    I think most of us long time readers are not really complaining about the editors/writers or doubt them, but we are concerned the future of this lovely site with Purch driving it.

    Because personally what I see from their track record, I doubt they'd be concerned about replacing the whole editorial team if they want to, and be satisfied to have acquired the brand and the domain name.
  • agoyal - Wednesday, December 17, 2014 - link

    I can see how this is going to pan out. There will be more content pushed at the pretense of "more eyeballs equals more ad revenue" at the expense of quality. This leads to slow vicious cycle of poorer quality and slow death like Toms hardware. Pardon me for being skeptic but people like me who have followed PC hardware since 90's have seen this happen too many times. Hope Ars does not sell to Purch. Sad day for a lot of us.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now