Over the past several years AnandTech has grown to be much more than just a PC hardware review site. In fact, we consider ourselves to be just as much about the new mobile world as we do about the old PC world. We leveraged our understanding of component and system architecture in bringing a deeper, more analytical look to mobile silicon and devices. As we continued to invest in our mobile coverage and expertise, we found that readers, mobile component and device makers responded quite well to our approach.

AnandTech’s focus grew, but we quickly ran into a bottleneck when it came time to monetize that mobile content. Our mobile content did a great job of helping to grow the site (as well as bring new eyeballs to our traditional PC coverage as well). While we had no issues competing with larger corporate owned sites on the content front, when it came to advertising we were at a disadvantage. Our advantage in quality allowed us to make progress, but ultimately it became a numbers game. The larger corporate owned sites could show up with a network of traffic, substantially larger than what AnandTech could deliver, and land more lucrative advertising deals than we were able to. They could then in turn fund a larger editorial operation and the cycle continues.

AnandTech has been profitable since its inception; it’s been on a great growth curve these past couple of years and we’ve always been able to do more with less, but lately there’s been an increased investment in high quality content. It wasn’t that long ago where the only type of content seeing real investment was shallow, poorly researched and ultimately very cable-TV-news-like. More recently however we’ve seen a shift. Higher quality content is being valued and some big names (both on the publishing and VC fronts) have been investing in them. Honestly we haven’t seen a world like this in probably over a decade.

Before his departure, Anand spent almost a year meeting with all of the big names in the publishing space, both traditional and new media players. The goal was to find AnandTech a home with a partner that had a sustainable business model (similar to AnandTech’s), but could add the investment and existing reach to allow the site to better realize its potential. That search led to a number of interesting potential partners; it was a refreshing experience to say the least knowing that there are groups in the world who really value good content. Ultimately that search brought AnandTech to Purch.

Purch met the requirements: they have a sustainable business model, are profitable and have the sort of reach AnandTech needs to really hit the next level. More fundamentally however, Purch’s values are in line with AnandTech’s. In fact, it wasn’t that long ago that Purch acquired one of AnandTech’s biggest competitors in the late 1990s: Tom’s Hardware. Purch had already demonstrated a value for the sort of deep, long form content AnandTech was known for. In meeting with the Purch business and editorial teams, there was a clear interest in further developing AnandTech’s strengths as well as feeding back AnandTech’s learnings into the rest of the Purch family.

AnandTech and Tom’s Hardware remain editorially independent, and though no longer competitors, the goal is to learn from one another. To further invest in the areas that make us different, and together with the rest of the Purch family help to bring a higher standard of quality to the web.

The AnandTech team is staying in place and will continue to focus on existing coverage areas. We’re not changing our editorial policies or analytical approach and have no intentions of doing so. The one thing that will change is our ability to continue to grow the site. This if anything starts from the top; with a publisher to more directly handle the business of AnandTech, this frees me up to spend more time on content creation and helping the rest of our editors put together better articles. And in a hands-on business like journalism that benefit cannot be overstated.

AnandTech was an incredibly powerful force as an independent publisher, but it now joins a family whose combined traffic is eight times larger than what AnandTech was on its own. Our goal is to continue to invest in what we feel is the right approach to building high quality content; now we have an even greater ability to do just that.

Press Release
Comments Locked

345 Comments

View All Comments

  • Kneedragger - Wednesday, December 17, 2014 - link

    Does this mean the aging forum will get a software update? Sure would be nice..
  • Ryan Smith - Wednesday, December 17, 2014 - link

    Not immediately. But yes, that's on my list of things I want to do.
  • Takamata - Wednesday, December 17, 2014 - link

    Ryan, et al. --

    Thanks for all you do and have done in supporting this site and the deep tech community. You are the good guys.

    I truly hope you can continue your run unabated. I can only hope that Purch understands the savvy user base here won't respond well to ad-splattering and lower quality content. Keep it alive.
  • JFP - Thursday, December 18, 2014 - link

    I'm Purch's CTO, and don't worry, we are already looking at how to do the upgrade.
  • RazrLeaf - Wednesday, December 17, 2014 - link

    To all the sad readers out there: Give your trusted editors/writers a chance. At least give them a proper chance to lose the credibility they've built up over the years. =P

    They've said for a long time that the business and the content side are separate, and in the coming years, they will have the chance to prove it. If things change for the worse, we will leave. But if things get better (as I hope they do), more will come. And that's good for all of us.
  • Kristian Vättö - Wednesday, December 17, 2014 - link

    "If things change for the worse, we will leave."

    And so will I. Anand has taught us all to be objective and value our editorial independence high, so if that is jeopardized I'll be on my way to the exit.
  • alacard - Wednesday, December 17, 2014 - link

    Kristian, if your editorial independence is so highly valued why did you sell in the first place?
  • Kristian Vättö - Wednesday, December 17, 2014 - link

    It's outlined in the article. Basically the acquisition allows us to keep growing the site as we have more power behind us that helps to negotiate better advertising deals. More money means more editors, which in turn results in more and higher quality content.
  • Moricon - Wednesday, December 17, 2014 - link

    Sorry man, you are working on the donut theory there, yes the bigger you make the donut, the bigger the hole in the middle, this is the road to being yet another craptastic review site, well done indeed in following the money!

    Anand has traditionally had the very best content of the highest quality, so what makes you think more money is needed to create what clearly has already been provided!

    Alacard states it as it is!
  • Kristian Vättö - Wednesday, December 17, 2014 - link

    Let me address the quantity first (and for the record, these are just my thoughts and observations and may not represent the Purch' or Ryan's point of views).

    There are ton of areas that we could explore more with increased resources. I can speak the best about the SSD and storage side as that's where my focus is in, and what I can say is that our enterprise SSD coverage has been lacking for quite some time now. The reason for that is the fact that one person (i.e. me) is simply not enough to cover both client and enterprise sides in full.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now