The Display

The big story behind the new iPad mini is of course its 7.85-inch Retina Display. We’re talking about the same 2048 x 1536 resolution as the iPad Air, but in a much smaller form factor. The result is the highest pixel density of any Apple display ships today, tying with the iPhone 5S. The impact on the overall experience is pretty significant. Text is obviously a lot sharper, but even graphics are a lot nicer to look at on the new Retina Display. The gains aren't quite as obvious as they were on the larger iPad, but after living with the Retina mini for a while I can't easily go back to the previous version.


iPad mini (left) vs. iPad mini with Retina Display (right)

I ran Marco Arment's image retention test on the Retina mini and didn't see even the slightest degree of image retention. My old, non-Retina iPad mini on the other hand exhibited image retention. I suspect Apple is multi-sourcing its displays here, which could obviously contribute to varied behavior. At least on the two minis I have, image retention isn't an issue.

In the conclusion of my iPad Air review I wrote about the new mini as finally being a no-compromises smaller iPad. Much like my assertions last year of a Retina mini not being in the cards, it turns out that I was wrong on this point as well. Although display resolution is no longer a concern on the mini, color gamut hasn’t changed between the old and new minis. A quick look at our gamut test gives us an idea of what’s going on:


The iPad mini with Retina Display has the same color gamut as the standard iPad mini, which is narrower than the iPad Air and less than the sRGB coverage we normally look for. The biggest issue here is that there are other smaller tablets in this price range that do offer sRGB coverage (e.g. Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HDX 8.9).

CalMAN Display Performance - Gamut Average dE 2000

I suspect the justification here is Apple likely views the bigger iPad as being a better fit for photographers/those who care about color reproduction, but it’s a shame that this is a tradeoff that exists between the two iPads especially given how good Apple is about sRGB coverage in nearly all of its other displays.

CalMAN Display Performance - Saturations Average dE 2000


One of the simplest visual tests is to use one of iOS 7’s more colorful wallpapers and compare the Retina mini and iPad Air side by side:


Pay attention to the color of the red triangles in the lower left


From left to right: iPad Air, iPad mini with Retina Display, iPad mini

The difference is small but apparent, particularly if you’re used to panels with full sRGB coverage like the iPad Air or any of the rMBPs/iMacs. The biggest deviations are in reds/blues and magenta in between as you can tell from the CIE chart above.

Within its gamut coverage, the mini’s panel is fairly accurate. A look at our GMB checker test shows performance competitive with the Nexus 7 and not far off the 4th generation iPad. Grayscale reproduction is also quite good. The display looks really good otherwise, but you don’t get the same visual punch you do on the iPad Air.

CalMAN Display Performance - Gretag Macbeth Average dE 2000

CalMAN Display Performance - Grayscale Average dE 2000

CalMAN Display Performance - White Point Average

Compared to the previous generation mini we’re obviously talking about a much better panel. But for those of you on the fence between the mini and Air, the Air does still hold a display advantage.

Black levels are competitive and contrast ratio stays fixed at around 800:1 regardless of whether we’re talking about max brightness or the 200 nits we run all of our battery life tests at. Max brightness is down a bit compared to the iPad Air.

Display Brightness - Black Level

Display Brightness - White Level

Display Contrast Ratio

The SoC & Performance Camera, WiFi & Cellular
Comments Locked

345 Comments

View All Comments

  • kyuu - Saturday, November 16, 2013 - link

    The T100 is not an 8" device.
  • solnyshok - Saturday, November 16, 2013 - link

    Previous mini was unreadable in sunlight. What about this new display?
  • solipsism - Saturday, November 16, 2013 - link

    If it's gotten better I wouldn't imagine it's by much since they didn't laminate the glass to the display. That space may allow too much light to bounce around. It looks like the Kindle Fire HDX looks like it's the best tablet for outdoor viewing on the market today.
  • R0H1T - Saturday, November 16, 2013 - link

    Not unless Ballmer or Gates sponsor these reviews ala Apple, also AT should really post these as sponsored content so as not to sway potential Android/Win8 buyers towards these overpriced fancy toys [:
  • Puberticus - Saturday, November 16, 2013 - link

    Are you insinuating that Apple sponsored this review? If so, sources please.
    Sigh, trolls do what they got to do…
  • ISwearImCool - Saturday, November 16, 2013 - link

    The comment section on this site borders on Autistic. Anand likes iOS. He says explicitly, it's a matter of personal preference. He suggests the Nexus 7 at the end of the review. What more do you people want?!
  • Graag - Saturday, November 16, 2013 - link

    They want validation for their status as tech geeks.
    If the unwashed masses can just buy Apple and have class-leading stats, it undercuts tech wannabees' claim to special knowledge. That's the real issue, and it bothers them that the most sophisticated review site on the web keeps discovering ways in which Apple is good.
    That's the reason why you don't see Apple users spamming the comments of Android device reviews with similar complaints.
  • evonitzer - Saturday, November 16, 2013 - link

    Um, what? Android v Apple is not a one way street. You new to comments?
  • kyuu - Saturday, November 16, 2013 - link

    You're claiming Apple users don't troll the comments on articles about Android devices? That's completely untrue. Are you new to the internet?

    Your pseudo-psychological analysis is way off base, as well.
  • Graag - Saturday, November 16, 2013 - link

    I'm claiming Apple users don't troll the Android reviews on Anandtech. Because it is true; look at AT's Android reviews and you won't find anything similar to the flying monkey squad that waits to swoop in and attack the Apple reviews, users, and devices.

    If you have a better theory for the compulsive need certain Android and Windows users have to troll the comments of all of AT's Apple reviews, I'd be happy to hear it. Perhaps you have received an actual diagnosis from a qualified therapist?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now