ATI Radeon X1950 Pro: CrossFire Done Right
by Derek Wilson on October 17, 2006 6:22 AM EST- Posted in
- GPUs
Battlefield 2 Performance
This benchmark is performed using DICE's built in demo playback functionality
with a few added extras built in house. When using the built in demo playback
features of BF2, frames rendered during the loading screen are counted in the
benchmark. In order to get a real idea of performance, we use the
instantaneous frametime and frames per second data generated from a benchmark
run. We discard the data collected during the loading screen and calculate a
result that represents the actual gameplay that was benchmarked. While DICE
maintains that results over 100fps aren't reliable, our methods have allowed
us to get useful data from high performing systems.
During the benchmark, the camera switches between players and vehicles in
order to capture the most action possible. There is a lot of smoke and
explosions, so this is a very GPU intensive Battlefield 2 benchmark. The game
itself is best experienced with average in-game framerates of 35 and up.
We ran Battlefield 2 using the highest quality graphics settings we could.
Shadows, lighting, and especially view distance are very important in order to
best play the game. In our opinion view distance should never be set to less
than the max, but other settings can be decreased slightly if a little more
performance or a higher resolution is required.
Its ability to offer 7900 GT levels of performance at the price of a 7900 GS makes the Radeon X1950 Pro quite a deal. The added memory speed gives the X1950 Pro a good advantage over the X1900 GT here. Of course, when the new handicapped X1900 GT comes along, expect this gap to widen. X1950 Pro CrossFire offers performance levels on par with X1900/X1950 XTX under BF2 without AA enabled. This puts it in competition with the 7900 GTX and offers much better performance than the 7950 GT. All what we would expect from $400 of graphics card. Interestingly, NVIDIA's 7900 GS SLI is able to offer better performance than X1950 Pro CrossFire in spite of the single card performance advantage the later maintains. This indicates that SLI scales much better than CrossFire under these conditions.
With 4xAA enabled, the X1950 Pro performs even better compared to the competition. CrossFire, however, doesn't give any more of a boost in comparison to X1900/X1950 XTX or 7900 GS SLI than we saw without AA. The X1950 Pro is an excellent choice as a single card solution, but for multi-GPU users, SLI is still a better bet.
45 Comments
View All Comments
Spoelie - Tuesday, October 17, 2006 - link
Bit disappointed, was hoping for 600/700 clocks. I'm curious about the temperatures under load and if it would easily overclock to at least those speeds. And what about HDCP? But I guess we'll have to wait for retail cards.If the price is €200 or less I just might be getting one to replace my x800xt :)
Spoelie - Tuesday, October 17, 2006 - link
Apparantly, powercolor clocks all its x1950pro cards up to 600/700 and have a 512mb sku. Plus silent cooling :)http://www.powercolor.com/global/main_product_seri...">http://www.powercolor.com/global/main_product_seri...
No word on hdcp and price tho :/
DerekWilson - Tuesday, October 17, 2006 - link
HDCP support is optional for vendors, but it seems like ATI is heavily encouraging them to include HDCP on all 1950 PRO cards. Since it's not guaranteed, be sure to check the specifications before you purchase.The power color 1950 PRO is not passively cooled but it includes a low dB fan. It does look like an interesting product, and we intend to acquire one for further investigation.
Goty - Tuesday, October 17, 2006 - link
Go read the review over at bit-tech. They've got prices up and the Saphire card they reviewed has HDCP.MadBadger - Tuesday, October 17, 2006 - link
Thanks for the review :beer;An observation:
-the pricefinder at the top of the article seems a bit out of whack. It shows as x1950 512 mb (PCI), but it links to the 1950 pro 256 mb for amazon and to the x1950 xt for the others.