AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy

Our Heavy storage benchmark is proportionally more write-heavy than The Destroyer, but much shorter overall. The total writes in the Heavy test aren't enough to fill the drive, so performance never drops down to steady state. This test is far more representative of a power user's day to day usage, and is heavily influenced by the drive's peak performance. The Heavy workload test details can be found here.

AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy (Data Rate)

Unlike on The Destroyer, the X400 can't quite keep pace with the Crucial MX200 or other MLC drives on the Heavy test, but it is still faster than the other planar TLC drives.

AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy (Latency)

The average service time of the SanDisk X400 on the Heavy test is the best among planar TLC drives, but the TLC drives are all still at the bottom of the ranking by comparison.

AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy (Latency)

The number of latency outliers experienced by the X400 puts it in the same class as the other planar TLC drives, while most of the MLC drives have much tighter control on latency.

AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy (Power)

As with The Destroyer, the X400 comes in third place for power consumption and overall efficiency, behind the Crucial BX100 and MX200. This is impressive given how write-intensive the Heavy test is and how the the higher power consumption of TLC flash is usually most apparent for write operations.

AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer AnandTech Storage Bench - Light
Comments Locked

41 Comments

View All Comments

  • runasroot - Thursday, January 12, 2017 - link

    Ugh, I can't edit my comment, come on.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now