HP Folio 13 Review: Deviating From the Normby Dustin Sklavos on April 17, 2012 12:30 AM EST
- Posted in
- Sandy Bridge
The initial bum rush of ultrabooks resulted in, with limited exception, a lot of designs that took most of their cues from Apple's MacBook Air. Even Dell's XPS 13, otherwise very different from what came before it, still maintained that wedge shape. Yet HP went a bit of a different route with their Folio 13 and demonstrated the same kind of outside the box thinking that many of the larger vendors are demonstrating these days.
HP's engineers took a look at Intel's ultrabook spec and, rather than see how small they could get their design, opted to see just how much they could pack into the spec. The result is the Folio 13, an ultrabook designed to bridge their consumer and business lines and offer the best an ultrabook can offer.
The ultrabook spec is pretty well defined without much in the way of wiggle room for the hardware itself, leaving vendors to differentiate largely on overall chassis design and price. The initial rush of ultrabooks included systems from Toshiba, Asus, and Acer that largely aped Apple's MacBook Air wedge shape and aluminum shell design, but HP and Dell played things close to the chest initially. HP's Folio 13 actually predates Dell's XPS 13, but both are intriguing designs that deviate from the norm in their own ways. Let's start with the specifications of our Folio 13 review unit.
|HP Folio 13 Specifications|
Intel Core i5-2467M
(2x1.6GHz + HTT, Turbo to 2.3GHz, 32nm, 3MB L3, 17W)
|Memory||1x4GB Micron DDR3-1600 (Maximum 1x4GB)|
Intel HD 3000 Graphics
(12 EUs, up to 1.15GHz)
13.3" LED Glossy 16:9 768p
LG Philips LP133WH4-TJA1
|Hard Drive(s)||Samsung PM810 128GB mSATA SSD @ SATA 3Gbps|
Intel Centrino 1030 802.11b/g/n
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit Ethernet
IDT 92HD99BXX HD audio
Headphone/mic combo jack
|Battery||6-Cell, 11.1V, 60Wh|
Headphone/mic combo jack
SD card reader
|Back Side||Exhaust vent|
|Operating System||Windows 7 Professional 64-bit SP1|
12.54" x 8.67" x 0.7" (WxDxH)
319mm x 220mm x 18mm
Starts at $899
As configured: $1,019
While most of HP's notebooks allow some level of customization, the Folio 13 really only has one internal hardware configuration, and you're looking at it. While some of the exterior elements are certainly a fresh approach for ultrabooks, HP has strangely opted to be much more conservative with speccing their ultrabook than other vendors have, and there are a few places where the Folio 13 is going to definitely lag behind the competition.
The Intel Core i5-2467M processor isn't slow by any stretch of the imagination, but it's the only ULV Core i5 we've tested this generation, with other vendors either just going for the cheapest chip (Toshiba's i3) or an expensive but faster i7. At a 1.6GHz nominal clock speed and able to turbo up to 2.1GHz on both cores or 2.3GHz on a single core, it's not a total slouch but it's also not the fastest chip around either.
HP also inexplicably uses only one memory channel on the i5's controller, and while the DDR3 is clocked higher at 1600MHz that can't make up for halving the memory bus width. Ultimately this shouldn't be a huge detriment to performance, but it's still performance left on the table. That single channel is populated by 4GB of RAM, too, which is enough for most tasks but is still shy of what can be achieved with most modern notebooks and even some modern ultrabooks.
Handling SSD storage duties is a Samsung PM810 running at SATA 3Gbps. Anecdotally, in real world usage I've found most of the benefit of running an SSD is felt just by virtue of the difference in responsiveness between an SSD and a mechanical hard disk drive. Connectivity is thankfully pretty good for this class of notebook, though: HP includes a USB 3.0 port and HDMI on top of the usual ports we've come to expect, along with a gigabit ethernet port for wired networking.
Ultimately, though, the specs on the Folio 13 are rather tame for an ultrabook, which is all the more perplexing since other vendors were able to cram more power into smaller designs. When I met with HP a few months ago when they were debuting the Folio 13, they showed me the interior and said they pretty much just doubled down on the battery, which is why the Folio 13 is also slightly bigger and heavier than other ultrabooks. Whether or not that gamble paid off remains to be seen.
Post Your CommentPlease log in or sign up to comment.
View All Comments
RaistlinZ - Tuesday, April 17, 2012 - linkI think they could have done a lot better. They must be making massive profit off each unit sold because I don't see anything spec wise that warrants a $1,000 for this. Toss in another 4GB of 1600DDR3 and a 1080p IPS screen and THEN we'll talk about $1,000.
milkywayer - Tuesday, April 17, 2012 - linkIt's a shame that HP and DELL are still milking the market with these lowly 768p screens on majority of their machines. I'd let this one pass since its a 13 incher but why on earth are they still making 99% of their 15.6" laptoptops 768p is beyond me.
My main laptop is an HP with a c2d 15.6" and I am not upgrading untill i can get at least a 1080p screen on my next laptop (no, i can't afford an apple)
GUessing the ipad3 screen res bump will get things in motion for higher res consumer screens on laptops from HP and dell or better yet, i'd like that hp and dell vaporise like NOKIA's way if they dont want to innovate.
Meaker10 - Tuesday, April 17, 2012 - linkWould not be so terrible if they were user upgradable but they save 0.001p per machine by not including the second LVDS channel.
ImSpartacus - Tuesday, April 17, 2012 - linkIt will probably be a while before OEMs catch up. Apple will have to release its "Retina" MBPs before anything really starts to move forward.
Cullinaire - Tuesday, April 17, 2012 - linkPrecisely
fic2 - Tuesday, April 17, 2012 - linkI have to agree. My 6 year old c2d laptop has a 1280x800 screen. Why would I "upgrade" to a worse screen? The cpu is still fine for my everyday tasks and I have upgraded the 60G HD and memory that came with it.
Every review I skip down to the screen resolution and when I see 768 I quite reading and skip to the comments to b1tch about it.
fic2 - Tuesday, April 17, 2012 - linkAlso, I spent ~$600 for my laptop why anyone would spend $1000 on this I have no idea.
GuinnessKMF - Tuesday, April 17, 2012 - linkFirst thing I did too, saw 768 and said "not interested". 1080p minimum at 13" for me to bite, until then I'll wait. I would even prefer better than 1080p but I know that for most consumers, even most power consumers, that's enough.
slagar - Tuesday, April 17, 2012 - linkExactly!
Drewdog343 - Thursday, April 19, 2012 - linkYou geeks must have the vision of a hawk, 1080p on a 13" screen is 168ish DPI.
I would imagine in Windows everything would be pretty tiny.