Much of the detail of the ASRock X99 BIOS is similar to that in our previous ASRock X99 motherboard reviews (Extreme11, OC Formula, X99-E/WS 10G, Extreme6). As a result we have copied the description and included it here for clarity, updated for the X99E-ITX/ac specific options.


The ASRock BIOS shifted slightly between Z87 and Z97, and it is the Z97 implementation we get on X99. This means the starry background is gone, replaced with a dark and blue-crystalline image. The icons are also reduced to mere text with a small image, and unlike the ASUS BIOS the menu sections are of equal size, which I prefer. There is also an adjustment to the OC Tweaker layout, which we will come to.

There is no ‘Easy Mode’ for the ASRock BIOS, with entry direct into this first Main screen. The right hand side of the BIOS is for description of the option selected, and the main segment shows information such as the BIOS version, CPU installed, CPU speed and memory installed. As mentioned in previous reviews, having some set of information relating to CPU voltages, temperatures and fan speeds might be useful here. If ASRock was to do an Easy Mode, it would make sense to have a one-button overclock option as well.

OC Tweaker takes heed of one of my previous complains about the ASRock overclock options. Previously there used to be a long list of options that continuously grew, depending on what options were left open to the user. For X99, ASRock has condensed these options into separate submenus similar in design to those we see on a GIGABYTE motherboard. Note that ASUS and MSI BIOSes currently go half-way between these extremes, offering some basic options with the more advanced ones in separate menus.

ASRock cuts straight to the chase – the first two options deal with overclocking. We have touched on features like Multi Core Enhancement many times previously, but it is interesting to have it so high up on the list of options. The Optimized CPU OC Setting gives an easy selection for overclocks based on ASRock’s internal testing:

ASRock has been conservative with only offering a 3.8 GHz option here – normally we see 4.0 / 4.2 / 4.4 / 4.5 options, some of which will push the best CPUs. By virtue of having a smaller system, which might be more temperature sensitive, only one option is offered. Personally I would prefer to have the other options as well.

The OC Tweaker menu is split into four sections. CPU Configuration gives options for CPU Ratio, multiplier, frequency, turbo boost and power limits:

DRAM Configuration allows for XMP application, DRAM strap adjustment, DRAM voltage and sub-timing adjustment, all the way through primary timings, secondary timings, tertiaries and others.

ASRock still uses the DRAM Tweaker function to fine tune the JEDEC and XMP responses to each memory kit. The ASRock BIOS also offers a DRAM Frequency overclocking preset list which will adjust the CPU strap and BCLK frequency needed to achieve various speeds.

The FIVR Configuration menu from the OC Tweaker page deals primarily with the CPU and CPU Cache/uncore voltages.

The Voltage Configuration menu has the other voltages on the system, including VCIN to the FIVR and load line calibration. The Load Line Calibration option also comes with a handy graph showing what each setting means:

Unfortunately this arrangement of voltages is mildly confusing. Typically an overclocker will adjust the CPU voltage and the Load Line Calibration settings enough to get the right combination, and ASRock has placed these options in two different menus. If the CPU VCore option could be duplicated in the Voltage Configuration menu, this would be preferable.

The Advanced tab deals with other elements of the system configuration, such as the chipset, storage and super IO calibrations. This includes fixing power modes, PCIe linking speeds, disabling or enabling onboard controllers and adjusting RAID configurations.

An adjustment to the X99 BIOS is that the Active Page on Entry setting has been moved here.

By default the ‘Above 4G Decoding’ inside the Chipset Configuration menu is disabled, for users that want PCIe coprocessors that require this feature.

The Tools menu is typically where ASRock tries out its more unusual ideas, although we do not get anything new for X99 that we have not seen on Z97 already. The System Browser shows the different elements of the motherboard and what is detected:

The Online Management Guard (OMG) allows the user to enable or disable the network ports at various times of the day, as determined by the system time:

(It is amusing that this feature is aimed more at controlling when a child is allowed online, but X99 is not exactly a system configuration used as secondary machines.)

The Dehumidifier function now gets its own sub menu, allowing fans to spin for a fixed time after the machine is in S5:

The H/W Monitor tab is where the temperatures, fan speeds and voltage monitoring tools are all kept, and we have seen an effort by the other manufacturers to improve the fan control situation. ASRock now joins them with the FAN-Tastic tuning option, moving into a more interactive type of scenario. This extends the multi-point gradient options into something more clickable, similar to the ASUS implementation. For example, a user can put a fan into one of five modes or customize the profile:

Rather than using the interface, users can do it the older way:

There is also an option to select which temperature sensor is being read from to make these adjustments.

The rest of the BIOS deals with security, boot order and fast boot options. In the Save and Exit menu we do get options for Boot Override:

ASRock X99E-ITX/ac Overview, Visual Inspection, Board Features Software
Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • mobutu - Wednesday, June 24, 2015 - link

    In the Linus video that you linked in the article, they test is with 2*16 = 32GB RAM:
  • Samus - Wednesday, June 24, 2015 - link

    Ian, even if we are the only two customers asrock has for this board...I'm ok with that because I'm glad somebody actually took the time to properly engineer and manufacture the high end Intel platform in ITX. Just amazing what has been accomplished here.
  • piasabird - Wednesday, June 24, 2015 - link

    It kind of defeats the purpose to use a powerful CPU in a MINI-ITX system. X99 should be Quad Lane DDR4 Memory access. The more powerful the Processor the more it can benefit from lots of the fastest RAM. A MATX setup might make more sense. You are also forced to use a video card due to no onboard IGP for that socket.
  • Samus - Thursday, June 25, 2015 - link

    If you didn't want to use the PCIe lane for a video card, there is a BCM. You can boot and run the entire system without a videocard. The BCM can even do 1920x1080!

    You could easily add an 8" 8-port Areca SAS RAID card to that 16x slot, although I don't know why you'd want ITX (or this platform at all...) if your plan was to make a file server.
  • TomWomack - Friday, June 26, 2015 - link

    Did you read the article? Its entire purpose was to quantify the cost of switching to dual-lane DDR4, and it quantified it as 'not very much under most circumstances'.
  • glugglug - Wednesday, June 24, 2015 - link

    They should have waited just a little longer, and included HD6200 graphics. A small server like this with QuickSync and no need for a video card would be something.
  • Samus - Thursday, June 25, 2015 - link

    You don't need a video card or onboard video. It has a management chip (BCM) that can output video via CAT5e. You can use a media converter or just use remote management.
  • Gigaplex - Thursday, June 25, 2015 - link

    Who would include the HD6200? That's part of the CPU, not the motherboard.
  • fallaha56 - Wednesday, June 24, 2015 - link

    stick a Fury Nano in this and let's see some action ;-)
  • just4U - Wednesday, June 24, 2015 - link

    I am interested in these smaller boards.. sure the Quad channel memory would be nice but whatever.. no biggie.. No crossfire/SLI isn't a issue for me either since I only ever use one Video Card (usually mid-high end)

    The only complaint.. I've yet to find a mini-itx case I want to build a system around. So I keep going the Matx route instead.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now