ASRock Z77 Extreme6 Review: Legacy Bites Backby Ian Cutress on July 13, 2012 2:00 PM EST
- Posted in
ASRock are not afraid of the legacy connections. Not merely content on having both a floppy drive header and an IDE connector on the Fatal1ty Z77 Professional, they have also put a floppy header on the Z77 Extreme6. There is reason for this, given that industrial equipment can cost $millions and a shiny new PC to process the data costs a lot less, even if they can only communicate via Floppy. Today we are looking at the performance and package that comes with the Z77 Extreme6, and see if it holds up with its price tag against the vast array of Z77 motherboards currently on the market.
ASRock Z77 Extreme6 Overview
Performance is an odd test on a motherboard for the most part. Every major facet of the motherboard is often in the control of something else - the CPU takes care of computation, the RAM looks after local data management, the chipset for IO, and audio for audio. The motherboard is merely the collection of controllers collated with design, with a vendor specific flair of aesthetics and software on top. So why test the performance?
More often than not, in each of the circumstances listed above, the motherboard comes in as the second most important feature. The routing between two components will determine the latency, or the decision to use one port per controller rather than two may influence throughput. These differences do not show up significantly during testing (CPU tests, for example) unless the motherboard becomes the limiting factor in some regard. This is why we try to test with the best CPU, the best memory, and so on. However, areas such as the DPC Latency (how the CPU and chipset deal with requests) are governed by the BIOS, something that the motherboard directly influences.
Thus, if a motherboard happened to perform near the bottom in the majority of the tests is quite alarming - somehow, the board has a flaw at some level. What if the difference between the board and the second from bottom board was very slight every time, coming in at less than 1%? How would we analyze such a product? Would it be bad?
Unfortunately, this is where the Z77 Extreme6 fits in many of our tests. It lacks the MultiCore Enhancement that both ASUS and Gigabyte apply to their boards for extra MHz at full loading, as well as long-term stability with my standard G.Skill DDR3-2400 testing kit.
This is not a concern if you run an overclock though, as the Z77 Extreme6 board overclocks the CPU quite well, reaching 4.7 GHz on our test chip with 1.175 volts in the BIOS and only 82ºC during OCCT.
Software wise, ASRock has paired the Extreme6 with their normal feature set plus a couple of bonuses for Z77 - namely their Online Management Guard facility and 'Dehumidifier Function'. These two lack significant substance by being only BIOS based utilities though - ideally, a software implementation would be preferred.
For the price, we get ASRock's great little USB 3.0 bracket in the box, as well as a complete set of video outputs on the IO. As a sneaky little addition as well, users can put in three AMD GPUs for 3-way CFX, if you do not mind the third card limited to x4 PCIe 2.0 coming from the chipset (analyzed later in the review). This does away with the need for a PLX PXE 8747 chip on board, which would have increased the price by another $30 or so.
The ASRock Z77 Extreme6 is a capable motherboard for most usage scenarios. Just add some nice DDR3-2133 memory and apply a CPU overclock. However, it lacks some substance and a spark over other major motherboard manufacturers.
With the Z77 Extreme6, compared to the Z77 Extreme4, there are a significant number of changes, both visual and in terms of features. For a start, the heatsink design is more pronounced, using something similar to their X79 range in terms of black and gold ridged and edged surfaces.
Onboard is also an mSATA port, right in the middle between the first PCIe slot and the PCI slot. Above the PCIe slots is a 4-pin molex power connector to provide extra power to the PCIe slots, although I am kind of getting tired of seeing it put in this location. If anything, it should be at the bottom end or beside the 24-pin power connector, as having it above the PCIe slots just means that there will be cables all over the place.
One other less obvious change to the Z77 Extreme4 is that there is a Floppy drive header on board. Yes, you heard me right – floppy drive! It seems odd now to include this legacy connection. It still has a place in industrial concepts (where a machine uses floppy drives and costs 1000x more than the PC processing its data), but not particularly on a higher end product which may be geared towards gaming and overclocking. As ASRock seem to be the only manufacturer pursuing this path on their consumer line, then it creates a niche just for them.
In terms of fan headers on board, we have one three-pin beside the 8-pin 12V power connector, two CPU headers (one 4-pin, one 3-pin) just to the right of the top heatsink, two chassis three-pin headers beside the molex connector, and another 4-pin chassis header on the bottom of the board. On the right hand side, the USB 3.0 connector has been placed beneath the 24-pin ATX power connector, followed by the SATA ports. Like the Extreme4, we have the PCH SATA ports (two SATA 6 Gbps and four SATA 3 Gbps) and two extra SATA 6 Gbps from an ASMedia ASM1061 controller.
Around the larger chipset heatsink, we have power/reset buttons and a two digit debug display, both of which I personally like to see as a reviewer (makes my job a bit easier) but also helps overclockers. On the south side of the board, apart from that floppy connector I mentioned, we have a COM port, front panel audio, and an array of USB 2.0 headers.
PCIe layout is similar to the Z77 Extreme4, with a PCIe x1, PCIe 3.0 x16/x8, an mSATA connector, PCI, PCIe 3.0 x8, PCI, and a PCI 2.0 x4. This allows a user to use a dual GPU setup, and still have access to a PCIe x1 and x4.
Aside from the bowed picture from ASRock, we have something similar to the Extreme4 for the IO back panel, though this time with a DisplayPort output. From left to right, we have a combination PS/2 port, two USB 3.0 ports (blue), a D-Sub port, DVI-D, DisplayPort, HDMI, a ClearCMOS button, two USB 2.0 (red), an IEEE1394 port, eSATA, gigabit Ethernet, two more USB 3.0 (blue), and audio outputs including an optical SPDIF.
|ASRock Z77 Extreme6|
Four DDR3 DIMM slots supporting up to 32 GB
Up to Dual Channel, 1066-2800 MHz
|Video Outputs||DisplayPort, HDMI 1.4a, DVI-D, D-Sub|
|Onboard LAN||Broadcom BCM57781|
|Onboard Audio||Realtek ALC898|
2 x PCIe x16 Gen3 (x16, x8/8)
1 x PCIe x16 Gen2 (x4)
1 x PCIe x1 Gen2
2 x PCI
1 x mini PCIe
2 x SATA 6 Gbps (PCH), Support for RAID 0, 1, 5, 10
2 x SATA 6 Gbps (ASMedia ASM1061)
4 x SATA 3 Gbps (PCH), Support for RAID 0, 1, 5, 10
Two USB 3.0 at rear (PCH)
Two USB 3.0 at rear (Etron EJ168A)
One USB 3.0 header (PCH)
4 x SATA 6 Gbps
4 x SATA 3 Gbps
1 x Floppy Connector
1 x IR Header
1 x CIR Header
1 x COM Header
1 x SPDIF Header
1 x 4-pin Molex power connector
Two Digit Debug LED
6 x Fan Headers
Front panel audio connector
3 x USB 2.0 headers (support 6 USB 2.0 ports)
1 x USB 3.0 header (supports 2 USB 3.0 ports)
1 x 24-pin ATX connector
1 x 8-pin 12V connector
1 x 4-pin Molex for PCIe
2 x CPU Fan Header (one 4-pin, one 3-pin)
3 x CHA Fan Headers (one 4-pin, two 3-pin)
1 x SYS Fan Header (one 3-pin)
1 x Combo PS/2 Port
1 x DisplayPort
1 x HDMI 1.4a
1 x DVI-D
1 x D-Sub
1 x Optical SPDIF
2 x USB 2.0
4 x USB 3.0
1 x IEEE1394
1 x Gigabit Ethernet
1 x Clear CMOS
|Warranty Period||3 years from date of purchase|
Nothing immediately jumps out from the board features list aside from the differences to the Z77 Extreme4. This is a quite good package for an MSRP of $175.
Post Your CommentPlease log in or sign up to comment.
View All Comments
albiglan - Friday, July 13, 2012 - linkI liked the parts about the difficulty in reviewing motherboards and the explanation of the humidity feature. (Overclocking could maybe have benefited from a table layout)
Would be nice to see additional benchmarks for things not directly related to performance (something that covers things like ease of setup, stability, etc. that is easy to compare against other mobos...)
IanCutress - Friday, July 13, 2012 - linkI have a board on the test bed now that was a little different to set up - all the additional controllers had to be installed one by one. Every other board manufacturer usually has a one button install for drivers and software. Odd.
It is hard to benchmark stability. We don't have infinite CPUs to keep all the boards running for days. I only have one CPU, and when one motherboard is tested I move it on to the next one. All I can do are my PovRay/OCCT tests to make sure it won't fall over in the first five minutes or so. I'm sure there are owners of these boards (like cknobman) who have been using these boards in a real world context that can give you a hint as to how they feel about their boards :)
xodius80 - Friday, July 13, 2012 - linkplease anand, its time to move into the future of computing, we need a floppy port benchmark to see how well the chipset handles the data over competing products.
extide - Friday, July 13, 2012 - linkOr are the pictures of the ATX headers on ALL ASRock boards show a bowed motherboard? I swear I have seen that like 2-3+ times before.
Draconian - Friday, July 13, 2012 - linkI'm disappointed they didn't include an IDE port. It really would've made this board stand out from the competition. I'm in the market to buy a Z77 board in the next month or so.
My wish list for a Z77 board:
Thunderbolt, IDE, and eSATA on the same board
Don't care about Floppy or mSATA
arthur449 - Friday, July 13, 2012 - linkBuy a cheap IDE->SATA converter for your older drive. One of the requirements of the SATA standard was that it be backwards compatible with IDE.
Or get a USB 2.0 to IDE converter (I'm not certain if USB 3.0 -> IDE converters exist for cheap). You'll be limited to ~40MB/s, but you'll have hotswap functionality without the potential headache of making sure old school IDE drives are run in IDE mode instead of the usual AHCI that most folks prefer for NCQ support.
geforce912 - Friday, July 13, 2012 - linkIDE is a parallel bus and it is not compatible with SATA which is a serial point to point connection (Hence SATA is not backwards compatible with IDE). Those IDE>SATA converters are active converters and not just simple wire-crossing. Same goes for usb which is serial point to point.
ypsylon - Saturday, July 14, 2012 - linkSeriously, both additions are completely pointless. To some extent I can understand IDE, perfect for equally antiquated optical drives which are still around, but floppy.... I haven't used those in years, something around 10 for sure. If somebody need floppy then USB floppy is the logical choice. If AsRock are so concerned about legacy support then where is Fast SCSI port? I still own my first FastSCSI HDD for sentimental reasons. It weights ~ as much, as car battery but it works.
duffman55 - Saturday, July 14, 2012 - linkI just upgraded my computer with the ASRock Z77 Extreme4 at the beginning of the week. It consistently threw a blue screen error a few seconds after it started to load Windows which I found out was because I didn't have the AHCI drivers installed. I had to switch to IDE mode, boot up, install the drivers, then switch back to AHCI.
What's the difference between the IDE and AHCI modes when using a SATA drive? It makes no sense to me to have an IDE mode for SATA devices.
P.S. On the BIOS and software page you mistyped AHCI as ACHI.
Coup27 - Saturday, July 14, 2012 - linkWhat is a COM header? Is this a serial port under a different name?
Personally I think this product makes no sense. Anybody buying a "legacy" motherboard would try and find one with native serial and parallel ports for starters. Serial is still very much alive in the automation sector with barcode readers, PLC, funky sensors etc..
Unfortunately Fujitsu are the only laptop manufacturer left making new laptops with native "legacy" ports.