SiFive Announces First RISC-V OoO CPU Core: The U8-Series Processor IPby Andrei Frumusanu on October 30, 2019 10:00 AM EST
In the last few year’s we’ve seen an increasing amount of talk about RISC-V and it becoming real competitor to the Arm in the embedded market. Indeed, we’ve seen a lot of vendors make the switch from licensing Arm’s architecture and IP designs to the open-source RISC-V architecture and either licensed or custom-made IP based on the ISA. While many vendors do choose to design their own microarchitectures to replace Arm-based microcontroller designs in their products, things get a little bit more complicated once you scale up in performance. It’s here where SiFive comes into play as a RISC-V IP vendor offering more complex designs for companies to license – essentially a similar business model to Arm’s – just that it’s based on the new open ISA.
Today’s announcement marks a milestone in SiFive’s IP offering as the company is revealing its first ever out-of-order CPU microarchitecture, promising a significant performance jump over existing RISC-V cores, and offering competitive PPA metrics compared to Arm’s products. We’ll be taking a look at the microarchitecture of the new U8 Series CPU and how it’s built and what it promises to deliver.
As a bit of background on the company, SiFive was founded in 2015 by the researchers who invented the RISC-V instruction set at UC Berkeley back in 2010. The company’s goal was to develop and implement CPUs and IP based on the RISC-V ISA and produce the first hardware based on the technology. The company first full-blown CPU IP that was able to run a full OS such as Linux was the U54 series which was released in 2017, and ever since SiFive has been in an upward trend of success and hypergrowth.
Introducing the U8-Series - A Scalable Out-of-Order RISC-V CPU Core
Up until now, it’s been relatively unsurprising that if you’re designing a new CPU based on a new ISA, you first start out small and then iterate as you continue to add more complexity to your design. SiFive’s U5 and U7 series as such have been relatively more simplistic in-order CPU microarchitectures. While offering functionality and being very cost-effective options and alternatives compared to Arm’s low-end and microcontroller cores, they really weren’t up to the task of more complex workloads that needed more raw performance.
The new U8-Series addresses these concerns by massively improving the performance that can be delivered by the new microarchitecture – outpacing the U54 and U74 by factors of up to 5-4x, a quite significant performance jump that we don’t usually see very often in the industry.
The new CPU IP’s performance promises to vastly expand SiFive’s and the RISC-V’s ecosystem viability in end-point products, and really be able to offer alternatives to the embedded Arm products in the world today and in the future.
SiFive’s design goals for the U8-Series are quite straightforward: Compared to an Arm Cortex-A72, the U8-Series aims to be comparable in performance, while offering 1.5x better power efficiency at the same time as using half the area. The A72 is quite an old comparison point by now, however SiFive’s PPA targets are comparatively quite high, meaning the U8 should be quite competitive to Arm’s latest generation cores.
Post Your CommentPlease log in or sign up to comment.
View All Comments
Wilco1 - Thursday, October 31, 2019 - linkThere is no such requirement in RISC. SIMD is big and complicated of course but so is floating point and it naturally fits with the floating point pipeline.
Lbibass - Tuesday, November 5, 2019 - linkI mean, look at intel! They've been stuck at 14nm for the past half-decade. And this company can fix their issues quite quickly. They're much more nimble.
digitalgriffin - Wednesday, November 6, 2019 - linkYes because Arduino, ESP8x and RaspPi, all need SIMD and Vect ops. (Bit of sarcasm there) These devices sell in the millions mostly as IOT Edge or embedded control devices.
FunBunny2 - Wednesday, October 30, 2019 - linkOne of the Intel CxOs, back around the release of the 8086, allowed as how he'd rather have the chip in every Ford than in every PC. Not likely anyone would say so today, but the use of embedded cpu is where this all started, not PC cpu.
What matters, if anyone can do it, is an analysis of dissimilar ISA, ARM v. RISC-V for example, without regard to implementation, e.g. cache size and other 'stretchable' components that depend on engineering of silicon (area, mostly), not abstract architecture. As many have said over the years, RISC machines (real world) have incrementally included CISC instructions.
name99 - Wednesday, October 30, 2019 - linkIt's SiFive's first OoO core, not the first RISC-V OoO core.
BOOM (Berkeley Out of Order Machine) is from around 2016
levizx - Wednesday, October 30, 2019 - link2.3X IPC * 1.4X F = 3.22X PERF
and since 2.3, 1.4 are "higher" while 3.1 is "total", it actually should be
3.3*2.4=7.92X performance >> 3.1X
Something isn't right.
The_Assimilator - Wednesday, October 30, 2019 - linkIt's marketing to secure more funding because the company doesn't actually have any real silicon to show, what do you expect?
surt - Saturday, November 2, 2019 - linkThe 2.3x IPC part is ideal, the processor isn't magically going to never stall etc. If they can actually get as close as 3.1/3.22 that's very good. And yes the wording makes you want to add one but they clearly didn't mean that.
EugeneBelford - Wednesday, October 30, 2019 - linkKate Libby: RISC is good
Samus - Friday, November 1, 2019 - linkHackers predicted so much yet nothing at all :)